Hey all,
Anybody else noticing bad page view events from bing.com referrals, where the stm
parameter is a decimal number instead of a epoch timestamp?
What tips and tricks are out there to either stop the noise or correct the problem?
Hey all,
Anybody else noticing bad page view events from bing.com referrals, where the stm
parameter is a decimal number instead of a epoch timestamp?
What tips and tricks are out there to either stop the noise or correct the problem?
Hi Adam! What tracker and what version are you using? Does this only affect page views? Where are you seeing the dodgy stm parameters - in modelled data?